Thursday, 15 September 2011

A life for a life

"Most of us continue to believe that those who show utter contempt for human life by committing remorseless, premeditated murder justly forfeit the right to their own life."  -- Alex Kozinski, U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

5 comments:

  1. The title of your blog is 'life is beautiful' and yet you have a quote saying that most believe that in capitol punishment. But its an American quote. So are you looking at capitol punishment as a whole or something that should be introduced back in New Zealand law. I am very curious to see where you take this blog. You have me most intruged.
    Personally I don't believe in the death penalty. While there are crimes I have read about where I think the world would be better if we removed the guilty person from existence, I don't see what gives us the right to end any life that is entirely out of necessity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. well, the title actually...is there before i decided on this topic.. so it might seem alittle bit off the topic. i might change it. and i personally believe in DP. because to me, letting the murderer live is the most unfair thing that could happen to the victim's family.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh I didn't know what your title meant but then I read the first comment lol. But thats a very nice quote you've got there :)
    We have no right to decided whether a person lives or dies.. But they should at least pay for their crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Life for a life! Eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Justice, punishment repentance and renewal. Do the time, feel the pain, get better and give back! When you take someones life, the people left behind have to try and re-build theirs. When you take one, you take many. Yes I agree Clarice, you do the crime you do the time; whether it be life or death (depending on what country you are in). Would like to read more of your blog when you post the rest :).

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think there are cases where the death penalty is appropriate. The problem is enshrining it in law and having the law to be open to less than complete objectivity.

    ReplyDelete